letter from the police

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mikesmotorbike said:
TheWisconsinRider said:
This letter made me laugh! When you call him back, ask him if he subscribed!!! hahaha

lol! yes do this

Gotta be done! :D

I would give him a quick call, though, if I were you. You need to explain the situation about the byway - if you come clean about that you might get a heads-up from him about anything else they're looking at on your vids. If you just ignore it you'll just get paranoid about the whole thing! :?

They probably won't tell you the source, but I'd bet it's someone from Youtube who's dobbed you in. Possibly one of the locals who've also stumbled onto your vids. Do a vlog just for them! :mrgreen:
 
Daffee said:
MotoRick said:
Stenno said:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u6uw7506xMw[/youtube]

OMG, that is hilarious. That's was near the border with Mexico, not an internal border between US states. I see it was shot in southern Arizona. Bravo to the author of that video for sticking to his guns in an intelligent and non-confrontational manner.


Author of that video needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.

My thoughts entirely I couldn't watch much more before getting violently angry at the idiot holding the camera... twatgasm! "I'm going to invite negative energy to my world by filming a situation that is generic and ordinary which is in place to maintain my 1st world quality while making sure that 3rd world people don't invade my lifestyle"
 
All you people who get all "violently angry", I'm amazed at how you Brits are so happy to exchange freedom for "security". Some of us don't take kindly to being pulled over by jack-boot wearing authority figures from the government. Might have something to do with lessons we learned in the past.
 
security? what security didn't you hear about the London riots they should of just poped a few of them thieving idiots off probably also kill off a bike theft or 2.

i used to get pulled over on a daily basis about one thing or the other normally to do with the cracked l plates or licence plate angle since i have passed i have not been pulled over once
 
I think the guy does a great job. Why can't he just drive down the road freely. The security officer uses intimidation rather than law to question him, asking him to pull over. Yet he knows she has no right, she's just hiding behind the badge. The guy has balls. It's people like him that delay the inevitable future where our every move is tracked. We'll all soon be microchipped at birth!
 
Sorry to derail the thread more... but im peeved now lol. That guy was being a twat! I know his type. He'll do something like this... and then a month from now he'll make a video about how he hates illegal immigrants. If you want to make a change, don't just go around being a giant asshole, do something about it.
 
Daffee said:
Author of that video needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.


Author of that quote needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.


Do you realize that United States citizens have rights? The police here cannot legally detain us unless it's in pursuit of a crime for which they need probable cause. One's presence in a location alone is not sufficient probable cause for a detainment and further questioning. This includes police asking for identification when I'm out walking or even sobriety checkpoints.
 
DodgeRider26 said:
Daffee said:
Author of that video needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.


Author of that quote needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.


Do you realize that United States citizens have rights? The police here cannot legally detain us unless it's in pursuit of a crime for which they need probable cause. One's presence in a location alone is not sufficient probable cause for a detainment and further questioning. This includes police asking for identification when I'm out walking or even sobriety checkpoints.

There exercising your right, and then theres deliberately getting into a situation, and filming it. Just to show what a big man you are, and that you know you rights. By all means know your rights, and use them when you need to, but stuff like this is pointless.
 
Chessecake94 said:
DodgeRider26 said:
Daffee said:
Author of that video needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.


Author of that quote needs to be shot multiple times, what a complete wanker.


Do you realize that United States citizens have rights? The police here cannot legally detain us unless it's in pursuit of a crime for which they need probable cause. One's presence in a location alone is not sufficient probable cause for a detainment and further questioning. This includes police asking for identification when I'm out walking or even sobriety checkpoints.

There exercising your right, and then theres deliberately getting into a situation, and filming it. Just to show what a big man you are, and that you know you rights. By all means know your rights, and use them when you need to, but stuff like this is pointless.

How did he "deliberately get into a situation"? It was a check point. He couldn't avoid it.

"Oh excuse me officer, I don't want to get into a situation, so I'll just be moving along."
 
How did he "deliberately get into a situation"? It was a check point. He couldn't avoid it.

"Oh excuse me officer, I don't want to get into a situation, so I'll just be moving along."

All he had to do was simply comply, there would have been no situation if he didn't fancy making a scene about it.
 
CurlyBlakey said:
How did he "deliberately get into a situation"? It was a check point. He couldn't avoid it.

"Oh excuse me officer, I don't want to get into a situation, so I'll just be moving along."

All he had to do was simply comply, there would have been no situation if he didn't fancy making a scene about it.

The whole point was to protect his right not to be detained without probable cause. I don't think you quite understand our rights under the Constitution. There is a tension in the US right now over the federal government over-reaching their authority to detain people. That's what this is all about. If the Federal officer really had the authority to get the information requested, I can guarantee he would not have been allowed to leave without complying. He called their bluff and they knew they had to let him go. It's really wrong that we have to go to these lengths to keep our freedoms from being trampled by the very people who are supposed to be protecting them.
 
MotoRick said:
CurlyBlakey said:
How did he "deliberately get into a situation"? It was a check point. He couldn't avoid it.

"Oh excuse me officer, I don't want to get into a situation, so I'll just be moving along."

All he had to do was simply comply, there would have been no situation if he didn't fancy making a scene about it.

The whole point was to protect his right not to be detained without probable cause. I don't think you quite understand our rights under the Constitution. There is a tension in the US right now over the federal government over-reaching their authority to detain people. That's what this is all about. If the Federal officer really had the authority to get the information requested, I can guarantee he would not have been allowed to leave without complying. He called their bluff and they knew they had to let him go. It's really wrong that we have to go to these lengths to keep our freedoms from being trampled by the very people who are supposed to be protecting them.

I've spent the last year and a half studying American politics buddy so don't think I don't know what I'm on about.

I know why he did what he did, I also know why the roadblock was there and the tensions that surround both. What he needs to understand, and it seems you need to also is that the only other option to this kind of stuff is no checks whatsoever, so you can get used to the federal government "undermining your rights" or you can get used to massive immigration and all the issues that come with it, it's up to you.

At the end of the day if the roadblock wasn't needed then it wouldn't be there. The government do not set out to infringe your rights, they set out to protect your society. If they did anything else they wouldn't be in charge. It took up more than his day to pick a fight with the poor girl than it would have done if he found some space in his brain not occupied by his encyclopaedic knowledge of the constitution to understand quite why that roadblock might be there.
 
MotoRick said:
CurlyBlakey said:
How did he "deliberately get into a situation"? It was a check point. He couldn't avoid it.

"Oh excuse me officer, I don't want to get into a situation, so I'll just be moving along."

All he had to do was simply comply, there would have been no situation if he didn't fancy making a scene about it.

The whole point was to protect his right not to be detained without probable cause. I don't think you quite understand our rights under the Constitution. There is a tension in the US right now over the federal government over-reaching their authority to detain people. That's what this is all about. If the Federal officer really had the authority to get the information requested, I can guarantee he would not have been allowed to leave without complying. He called their bluff and they knew they had to let him go. It's really wrong that we have to go to these lengths to keep our freedoms from being trampled by the very people who are supposed to be protecting them.

Amen to that!!! I've wanted to comment for a while, but seeing the difference in opinions made me hold my tongue for the sake of not ruffling peoples feathers.

The thing about all this that really gets under my skin is how most people WILL blindly comply for fear of something bad happening to them. Cops get that, and abuse the hell out of it because IF you comply their job is much easier, but if you don't comply you are "hiding something" as far as they are concerned and now it becomes a challenge.(most cops at that point will call in help from other cops) The MAIN problem with this system is that police are in NO WAY punished for violating our rights.. Even when it's on video and they end up admitting it. Worse case for them is "Oh Well, This guy knows the law so we have to let him pass, But we'll get the next one" Yet if an average citizen even acts like he's going to violate a police officers rights... You'll go strait to jail.

When I get pulled over I ask if I have time to call my friend _____ _____ the local judge. I only roll my window down far enough to pass my DL and insurance papers. If I'm asked out of the car I take the keys and LOCK the doors...
When cops ask if they can search my car I say NO!!! Then I immediately ask if I can search their car... They don't like that shit one bit, most won't even answer my questions. I want see ID from them, any certifications they have and I also request they submit to a roadside inspection of their police car. If they have a police dog I'm allergic and it needs to stay over 100ft from myself and any of my possessions. I also ask that they secure their firearm while in my presence.
Most cops are really stupid and don't know what to do or how to deal with me and just let me go for fear that I will get them in trouble as soon as they slip-up.
 
I've spent the last year and a half studying American politics buddy so don't think I don't know what I'm on about.

I know why he did what he did, I also know why the roadblock was there and the tensions that surround both. What he needs to understand, and it seems you need to also is that the only other option to this kind of stuff is no checks whatsoever, so you can get used to the federal government "undermining your rights" or you can get used to massive immigration and all the issues that come with it, it's up to you.

At the end of the day if the roadblock wasn't needed then it wouldn't be there. The government do not set out to infringe your rights, they set out to protect your society. If they did anything else they wouldn't be in charge. It took up more than his day to pick a fight with the poor girl than it would have done if he found some space in his brain not occupied by his encyclopaedic knowledge of the constitution to understand quite why that roadblock might be there.

Posting those roadblocks to catch illegal immigrants is about as successful as posting a cop at the front door of your local store to "catch" shoplifters.. Point being, it's stupid & it's a waste of taxpayer $$$ that is all for show so the retards(politicians) in this country can say they are "doing something about the problem".. If they do actually catch one or two trying to pass thru a roadblock they call it a success, but what about the one or two hundred that went around the roadblock. I've lived in illegal immigrant territory almost my whole life. If we want to control the borders(we don't want to and that should be clear to everyone but the really dense) then they would start putting illegals in prison camps(not regular US prisions, but work camps) and make them do hard labor for FREE. First offence 1yr, Second offence 5yrs, Third offence Death and buried by the state. Seems pretty harsh right??? Not when you consider that risk is not worth the reward anymore. That's the immigration problem in a nutshell: The reward is MUCH greater than the risk... For those non-Americans reading this, At this point in time they just get deported. IF, IF they can prove you are an illegal immigrant, but(for instance) police can't even ask during a traffic stop if you are in the country legally. Illegals can get gov. assistance and their illegal kids get to go to US public schools for free. If they get hurt they get treated at ANY hospital for free.(because everyone knows they aren't paying the bill, which only drives up the costs for those of us who do have to pay)

Ask some immigrants from El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Belize, Panama, or any of the South American countries what it's like trying to "make it thru" Mexico. That's the story you never hear about. Mexico is a deathtrap for those immigrants, but at the same time Mexico actually has programs in place to "help" Mexicans successfully get across the US border and get on food stamps if they can't find work.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Winners Video

Website Supported by Ipswich SEO

Latest posts

Back
Top