Serious Some one tried to take me out

[R-Rated]

I think the tag is the Mackinac Bridge Tag out of Michigan.

Too bad they got away...

 

[HippoDrone]

That is scary crazy, why did they brake check you? & doing that in those conditions is lethal, some doolally folk in the world! :-(

 

[R-Rated]

That is scary crazy, why did they brake check you? & doing that in those conditions is lethal, some doolally folk in the world! :-(

I am not sure. They were riding my tail for at least 5 cars in a row.

 

[HippoDrone]

I guess this is why bikes are not allowed to filter.... the other road users are too raged to be trusted not to shoot you all

 

[R-Rated]

Still shot from the raw video . . .

 

[F4celess]

To be honest, I don't see how this is any sort of attempt at "taking you out". That said the way the BMW behaved is highly questionable. Had there been a brakecheck instead of adjusting the speed it would be a different story. Sometimes incompetence can be confused with malice.

 

[R-Rated]

To be honest, I don't see how this is any sort of attempt at "taking you out". That said the way the BMW behaved is highly questionable. Had there been a brakecheck instead of adjusting the speed it would be a different story. Sometimes incompetence can be confused with malice.

Interesting point.

So your suggesting their changing of lanes on their part as I changed lanes to regain a buffer was coincidental including them riding the dotted line for two lanes?

 

[HippoDrone]

To be honest, I don't see how this is any sort of attempt at "taking you out". That said the way the BMW behaved is highly questionable. Had there been a brakecheck instead of adjusting the speed it would be a different story. Sometimes incompetence can be confused with malice.

it def looked like he brake checked @R-Rated to me, you can clearly see his brake lights come on when he pulls in front of the bike. The car also looked to be tailgating him prior to undertaking him if you look in the mirrors.

 

[R-Rated]

Thanks to both of you. @F4celess points would be ones a defense attorney might raise.

 

[F4celess]

Thanks to both of you. @F4celess points would be ones a defense attorney might raise.

I tend to take the role of devils advocate, not by choice usually, but hey it helps raise debate.

What I'm saying is they were an idiot by any standard but that they might not have been going for you individually.

 

[R-Rated]

I tend to take the role of devils advocate, not by choice usually, but hey it helps raise debate.

What I'm saying is they were an idiot by any standard but that they might not have been going for you individually.

Fortunately in US law, malice and being motivated by personal vendetta would only factor into sentencing of a crime.

The guilty verdict comes about when something like this is met (I am listing the complete law as written so that nothing is omitted:

55-10-205. Reckless driving.
(a) Any person who drives any vehicle in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property commits reckless driving.
(b) A person commits an offense of reckless driving who drives a motorcycle with the front tire raised off the ground in willful and wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property on any public street, highway, alley, parking lot, or driveway, or on the premises of any shopping center, trailer park, apartment house complex, or any other premises that are generally frequented by the public at large; provided, that the offense of reckless driving for driving a motorcycle with the front tire raised off the ground shall not be applicable to persons riding in a parade, at a speed not to exceed thirty miles per hour (30 mph), if the person is eighteen (18) years of age or older.
(c)
(1) Any motor vehicle operator who knowingly ignores a clearly visible and adequate flood warning sign or barricade and drives into a road area that is actually flooded commits reckless driving. In addition to the penalties imposed pursuant to subsection (d), the court may order the operator to pay restitution to defray the taxpayer cost of any rescue efforts related to such violation.
(2) It is an affirmative defense to prosecution under this section, which must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, that the operator's driving through the flood warning sign or barricade was necessitated by a bona fide emergency.
(3) This subsection (c) shall not apply to an emergency vehicle. "Emergency vehicle" means a vehicle of a governmental department or public service corporation when responding to any emergency, or any vehicle of a police or fire department, or any ambulance.
(d)
(1) A violation of this section is a Class B misdemeanor.
(2) In addition to the penalty authorized by subdivision (d)(1), the court shall assess a fine of fifty dollars ($50.00) to be collected as provided in § 55-10-412(b) and distributed as provided in § 55-10-412(c).

Nothing in there about proving malice or personal grudges. This is from Tennessee Code Annotated but I am sure the commonwealth of Kentucky has similar laws.

Then if the defendant wished to plead they were not in complete control of the vehicle, they might get around the willful but not the following because they would have admitted guilt if they said they were not in control...

55-8-136. Drivers to exercise due care.
(a) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this chapter, every driver of a vehicle shall exercise due care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian upon any roadway, and shall give warning by sounding the horn when necessary, and shall exercise proper precaution upon observing any child or any confused or incapacitated person upon a roadway.
(b) Notwithstanding any speed limit or zone in effect at the time, or right-of-way rules that may be applicable, every driver of a vehicle shall exercise due care by operating the vehicle at a safe speed, by maintaining a safe lookout, by keeping the vehicle under proper control and by devoting full time and attention to operating the vehicle, under the existing circumstances as necessary in order to be able to see and to avoid endangering life, limb or property and to see and avoid colliding with any other vehicle or person, or any road sign, guard rail or any fixed object either legally using or legally parked or legally placed, upon any roadway, within or beside the roadway right-of-way including, but not limited to, any adjacent sidewalk, bicycle lane, shoulder or berm.
(c) A violation of this section is a Class C misdemeanor.


Finally, based on my personal experience is that an officer may be inclined to charge a subject with more than one infraction even if they overlap a little. So you could also see improper lane change and maybe a couple of others...

 

[F4celess]

Yep, it is entirely illegal what he did. The driving was indeed reckless. If he did that in Norway he would have lost his license and plates on the spot.

 

[scottrod]

Dude thats brutal!

Especially in that weather!

I have one on my channel of a knob head coming into the side of me!

 

[R-Rated]

Dude thats brutal!

Especially in that weather!

I have one on my channel of a knob head coming into the side of me!

View attachment 3485

Crazy!