Fantastic use of the 360 camera mate.
Have you tried the render trick yet? With 1080, you generally only get the AVC codec when uploading to YouTube which is massively inferior to the VP9 codec you'd get if you uploaded it as 2.7k/4k, even if you record at 1080, try rendering it out to 4k and then see how it looks on YouTube, should give you full bitrate with no compression
Fantastic use of the 360 camera mate.
Have you tried the render trick yet? With 1080, you generally only get the AVC codec when uploading to YouTube which is massively inferior to the VP9 codec you'd get if you uploaded it as 2.7k/4k, even if you record at 1080, try rendering it out to 4k and then see how it looks on YouTube, should give you full bitrate with no compression
Just kidding - help Dewey out
It was @R-Rated that put me on to it!
With 1080, you generally only get the AVC codec when uploading to YouTube which is massively inferior to the VP9 codec you'd get if you uploaded it as 2.7k/4k, even if you record at 1080, try rendering it out to 4k and then see how it looks on YouTube, should give you full bitrate with no compression
I did a test on my latest upload, and yes it does make a difference, now I'll have to upload all the new stuff in 2.7k (well, or close to, as I use a slightly abnormal aspect ratio). It took forever to process the HD version, something like 30 hours from the time I hit upload until it was actually available. Now I have to decide if I want to re-upload the video's that are already in queue or not.
The advantage of scheduling videos, means I can upload a day (or two) before it goes live so it hits at full resolution.I did a test on my latest upload, and yes it does make a difference, now I'll have to upload all the new stuff in 2.7k (well, or close to, as I use a slightly abnormal aspect ratio). It took forever to process the HD version, something like 30 hours from the time I hit upload until it was actually available. Now I have to decide if I want to re-upload the video's that are already in queue or not.